No yet watched the televised version of the semi, but I'm told the commentary was an all-time low.

Can anyone confirm or deny?

Here's a tip, watch the game without commentary. Form your opinion on the game, then listen to the after match summary and you'll realise how clueless Eddie and stevo are.

They wanted Leeds to win. It's become the norm now.

Stevo sounded gutted at the end.

Ahh well, who gives a sh&te?

Good call. The reason I ask is because we'll be watching later today and the big question is - do we do it with or without.

If I were a TV commentator I'd be more than a little put out that some fans would rather watch with no sound at all than listen to my assessment, but I doubt Eddie and Stevo would care - Talk about Egos 'R' Us.

Just re-watched it and didn't think it was too bad to be honest.

I didn't notice much tbh.

They (well baldy) were full of praise for the creativity of our back line.

Clarke had a good dig at Bailey after he tried to scrag Sam's underpants off.

I just put it down to Bailey not wanting Sam to move to NZ.

Just watched it , bit of an early morning call to enjoy the banter down at the DW, and could not believe what I was hearing, it was all Leeds Leeds, suffering with injuries , tired , etc, well that is because our forwards took the game to them all night and they played last week because they lost the 1st play off game whereas we went away to the best team over the season and beat them simple, hard luck Stevo.

2 mins in, BJB's try ruled out..

Stevo "It's going to be close" "it's very close indeed"

Replay comes - "No he's lost it quite clearly"

Eddie called the dropped ball straight away.

I had no issues with the commentary last night. I think if people really had an issue with it they were probably looking for one.

i wasnt looking for anything , but i was sick of hearing ''leeds are on empty'' or ''he's out on his feet'' etc etc

leeds got tired because of the way we played the game

our forwards layed the platform for the backs to control and kick them to death