Headline in tomorrow's LE and apparently they have a big story to break...

Sounds interesting

Marc Green unhappy how RFL dealt with concern about possible SC infringement by Salford, specifically with Tony Puletua case. A letter got leaked to the paper. Apparently 2 other leading figures from SL clubs want to call in EGM into this matter.

"Bulls Boss Demands Answers From RFL" is the headline, according to a screenshot on Facebook that I have no idea how to post on here

Don't worry, we aren't in trouble.

The story is Marc Green has written to the RFL about supposed irregularities about the transfer of Puletua from Saints to Salford and apparently the RFL are dragging their feet. It's from council notes circulated to all clubs which have been leaked to League Express - not by Green though who wouldn't speak to the paper.

EDIT - As someone just above said! Apologies, didn't see.

Well what's the point of having a cap if we don't have a governing body capable or willing to apply the rules consistently?

We don't have a governing body capable of doing anything properly.

Out of interest and nothing else' do you want a governing body that governs for the few or one that listens to all its member clubs and acts accordingly?

Thought I would go to Company Check. Quite a few MK companies some dissolved some active very few with any accounts info except SCR (2013) showing a net worth of -5.5 million quid. Who is Andrew Chalmers?

Details apparently came out of the recent Puletua court case, that show he has two contracts. One with Salford and one with another of Koukash's companies. So it looks to be the same dual contract trick that other clubs have been alleged to utilise and that Keith Senior was proven to have when he signed for Crusaders and wanted the RFL to take action there.

It's a practice that's been (allegedly) going on for a while at some clubs, it's just that now there's a degree of proof because of the Puletua case bringing it to light.

There is also the allegation that some players have signed for Salford for contracts worth significantly less than they were offered by other clubs, alluding that they are being paid significant sums "off the books" outside of the club.

I thought the rule mentioned players receiving monies from 'third parties' [ie, people not connected with the club and if otherwise it should fall under the cap? Money from sponsors or the chairman with his other hat on, should fall under the cap rules. The RFL wrote these rules they should stand by them.